Abuja, Nigeria — 15 October 2025 — What began as a heated argument over the authenticity and pricing of custom-upgraded iPhones has exploded into a clash of reputation, privacy, and possibly intellectual property. The rivalry between social media critic VeryDarkMan and tech entrepreneur Blord has captured widespread public attention — and raised the question: Could Apple become involved?
From iPhone Feud to Private Clips Drama
The conflict traces back to allegations that Blord was offering refurbished iPhone XR models disguised as the newly released iPhone 17. VeryDarkMan publicly challenged Blord’s claims, accusing him of exploiting consumers with inflated prices.
As tension mounted, VeryDarkMan reportedly sent private videos (often referred to in social media as “gbola” or nude clips) to Blord — a move that further intensified the feud. Blord remained silent for a period, but eventually responded via a lighthearted video post, featuring him dancing, in what some interpreted as a deflection tactic.
Public Reaction & Legal Speculation
Netizens have been vocal, with many questioning whether Apple Inc. could take legal action against either party. The speculation centers on possible violations of Apple’s trademarks or unauthorized branding claims. One commentator, Dr. Paul Ezike, asserted in a viral video that the duo could face litigation for “intellectual property infringement, trademark violation, and counterfeiting.” Still, others doubted whether Apple would intervene, citing jurisdictional and practical challenges.
Blord Breaks Silence, But Stakes Rise
Blord eventually broke his silence — not by directly addressing the allegations, but by posting upbeat content and dancing to music. Some observers read this as a tactical pivot, others as avoidance of accountability.
Billionaire Blord is not new to controversy. His business activities in cryptocurrency, fintech, and mobile trade have previously drawn scrutiny and accusations, including allegations of fraud, money laundering, and funding irregularities. Meanwhile, VeryDarkMan continues to command influence as a social critic and digital activist.
Why This Matters for FundPeeps
-
Consumer protection & trust: The dispute highlights risks for consumers in Nigeria’s grey smartphone market, where refurbished or upgraded devices are often sold under premium branding.
-
Brand integrity & legal exposure: If Apple or regulatory bodies act, implications for brand misuse, trademark enforcement, and cross-border liability could ripple across Nigeria’s tech commerce landscape.
-
Influencer accountability & privacy: The use of private footage in public disputes raises ethical and legal concerns about consent, defamation, and online harassment.
Looking ahead:
Will Apple step in to protect its brand? Can either party substantiate their claims through transparent disclosure? And will consumers be caught in the crossfire? The days ahead may define not only reputations but also the boundaries of influencer-led disputes in Nigeria’s tech economy.
This country will never be cut short of drama